Nonetheless, they stays accessible to the audience relates to so it functions, which is the essence off emptiness
Medical research, check out tips, efficiency and you can interpretations was devised from the attention, and creative imagination and phrase and you will design programming. Suitable revealing out of results is also important. Especially in theoretical physics, linguistic expertise and you may carefulness when you are creating get an even more pressing need inside the the newest subjects in the limits regarding present studies. Discover folks from other areas who happen to be prepared to misunderstand and spark a lot of discourses/conclusions; they establish books away from a number of bytes of data like “yes/no/maybe”; for that reason, nonscience otherwise occult misinformation is provided, samples of and therefore abound regarding the areas regarding unique relativity theory and you will quantum physics. Ergo, technology cannot use the sentences one served the brand new Paleolithic notice. Category: General Research and you can Beliefs
Trappist-1 Superstar Program
New James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will quickly transcend just what Hubble might have been capable talk about. One of the basic goals will likely be brand new TRAPPIST-step 1 star program during the Aquarius. So it essay examines as to the reasons one puny red dwarf can be so interesting, and why brand new look for alien lifestyle variations age. Category: General Research and you will Opinions
Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the 
equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy