To begin with, i focused on the partnership between sexting reasons, conclusion and you may expectancies

Preliminary analytical analyses was carried out playing with detailed analytics including brand new reliability of your actions, mean ratings and you can percentages.

To choose and therefore subscale shall be as part of the regression research, a correlation ranging from all the aspect out-of sexting and its own subscales try conducted. Any rather relevant sext span subscale try within the regression to decide if it predicts the fresh new subscales of your sexting inspiration survey (Sexual motives, Human body Image Support, Instrumental/Furious Factors) and sexting behavior.

Furthermore, we presented linear regression amongst the Social media Habits and you will sexting issues to check on our theory, similar to the books [11,forty-five,46,47], one to an advanced level of habits predicted a top greater tendency in order to sext.

Eventually, to-do the fresh design and you can ensure in the event your behavioral/mental difficulties and defensive approach got a job during the sexting, we presented independent linear regressions within internalizing/externalizing subscales away from Youth/Adult Worry about Report, Factor step 1 and you may Grounds 2 away from REM-71 and you may SBQ, SMQ, Sq .. Brand new analyses had been used having fun with SPSS software (Adaptation 21.0, IBM, Armonk, New york, USA).

step three.1. Sexting Motives, Decisions and you can Expectancy

As regards the descriptive analyses concerning sexting motivations and sexting behavior, males have a higher score in almost all sexting dimensions except sexual purposes in which females have a slightly higher score (Table 1). However, conducting several ANOVAs we found that the only significantly different dimension is that of sexting behaviors where males have a higher score (SBQ score: female M = 33.8; male M = 36.5, p < 0.05,>

In addition, ANOVAs were conducted between males and females on sexting expectations. The results show a significance for two subscales of the Sexpectancies Questionnaire: negative expectations about sending sexts ( p < 0.001,>

The correlation analyses between the SMQ, SBQ and SQ have shown the results summarized in Table 2. Briefly, positive expectations of sending are strongly related to all dimensions of sexting, motivational and behavioral (respectively: p < 0.001>

Consistent with the study of Currin , we conducted regressions between SMQ, SBQ as regressors and SQ as a predictor. The detailed results in Table 3 show that sexting behavior is predicted only by positive expectations of sending ( p < 0.001,>

The check for multicollinearity in every regression in the present paper was conducted by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Conventionally, as suggested by Cohen and O’Brien , VIF values greater than 4–10 generally indicate severe multicollinearity. Our results are VIF < 3,>

step three.2. Social network Addiction and you can Sexting

Out-of research with the social networking dependency (female: Meters = 14.0 and you may DS = 5.59; male: Meters = a dozen.8 and DS = 5.10), the fresh new ANOVA anywhere between women and men don’t show one mathematically significant difference between the two groups.

The bottom line is, possible say that an advanced level of personal mass media dependency can result in a lot more desire to sext and participate more often in sexting conclusion.

step three.step three. Internalizing/Externalizing Problems, Protective Approach and Sexting

As regards the descriptive analyses on Youth/Adult Self Report and REM-71, the only statistically significant differences between males träffa Isländska kvinnor nära mig and females are given below. It emerges that females have higher levels in internalizing scales on youth/adult self-report ( p < 0.001,>

Secondly, we wanted to test our hypothesis that immature defensive strategies correlated with a more problematic type of sexting, such as instrumental/aggravated or body image reinforcement. To do this, we considered the two factors of REM-71 in correlation to each dimension of sexting motivations and behaviors. Correlation analysis found no significant relationship between sexting and factors 1 and 2 of REM-71. For this reason, from an exploratory perspective, we decided to investigate the individual subscales of REM-71, maintaining a more conservative p -value ( p < 0.01).>